Article Details

Scrape Timestamp (UTC): 2025-02-06 14:42:22.595

Source: https://thehackernews.com/2025/02/fake-google-chrome-sites-distribute.html

Original Article Text

Click to Toggle View

Fake Google Chrome Sites Distribute ValleyRAT Malware via DLL Hijacking. Bogus websites advertising Google Chrome have been used to distribute malicious installers for a remote access trojan called ValleyRAT. The malware, first detected in 2023, is attributed to a threat actor tracked as Silver Fox, with prior attack campaigns primarily targeting Chinese-speaking regions like Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Mainland China. "This actor has increasingly targeted key roles within organizations—particularly in finance, accounting, and sales department — highlighting a strategic focus on high-value positions with access to sensitive data and systems," Morphisec researcher Shmuel Uzan said in a report published earlier this week. Early attack chains have been observed delivering ValleyRAT alongside other malware families such as Purple Fox and Gh0st RAT, the latter of which has been extensively used by various Chinese hacking groups. As recently as last month, counterfeit installers for legitimate software have served as a distribution mechanism for the trojan by means of a DLL loader named PNGPlug. It's worth noting that a drive-by download scheme targeting Chinese-speaking Windows users was previously used to deploy Gh0st RAT using malicious installer packages for the Chrome web browser. In a similar fashion, the latest attack sequence associated with ValleyRAT entails the use of a fake Google Chrome website to trick targets into downloading a ZIP archive containing an executable ("Setup.exe"). The binary, upon execution, checks if it has administrator privileges and then proceeds to download four additional payloads, including a legitimate executable associated with Douyin ("Douyin.exe"), the Chinese version of TikTok, that's used to sideload a rogue DLL ("tier0.dll"), which then launches the ValleyRAT malware. Also retrieved is another DLL file ("sscronet.dll"), which is responsible for terminating any running process present in an exclusion list. Compiled in Chinese and written in C++, ValleyRAT is a trojan that's designed to monitor screen content, log keystrokes, and establish persistence on the host. It's also capable of initiating communications with a remote server to await further instructions that allow it to enumerate processes, as well as download and execute arbitrary DLLs and binaries, among others. "For payload injection, the attacker abused legitimate signed executables that were vulnerable to DLL search order hijacking," Uzan said. The development comes as Sophos shared details of phishing attacks that employ Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) attachments to evade detection and deliver an AutoIt-based keystroke logger malware like Nymeria or direct users to credential harvesting pages.

Daily Brief Summary

MALWARE // Bogus Chrome Installers Used to Deploy ValleyRAT Malware

Bogus websites promoting Google Chrome have been distributing malware-infected installers encoding a remote access trojan named ValleyRAT.

ValleyRAT, which surfaced in 2023, is linked to the Silver Fox threat actor group, known for its focus on Chinese-speaking regions including Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Mainland China.

The malware targets individuals in critical organizational roles, especially in finance, accounting, and sales, aiming to access private data and systems.

Attack methods previously included drive-by downloads targeting Chinese-speaking users of Windows via fake Chrome installer packages, akin to those used to deploy Gh0st RAT.

Recent attack vectors involve a fake Google Chrome site that gets users to download a ZIP file with a malicious "Setup.exe." This setup file checks for administrative privileges and then pulls additional malicious payloads.

ValleyRAT can monitor screen content, capture keystrokes, and maintain persistence on infected machines. It communicates with a remote server for further malicious activities, including downloading and executing additional payloads.

Analyst Shmuel Uzan mentioned that signed legitimate applications vulnerable to DLL search order hijacking were exploited to facilitate payload injections.